FabR[Senior Patek Moderator]
26166
An interesting proposition -- a 170k+ tourbillon is a very high-level choice for a sports watch, but given the limited production I don't think they are taking any chances here anyway.
Apr 24, 2020,10:35 AM
And I think it does reflect well on LF that they didn't go down the usual beaten path of a steel, entry-level piece to compete with the Nautilus/Royal Oak. Cheers.
Comments:
view entire thread
I second that...
By: mdg : April 24th, 2020-09:22
...only because I can't afford the tourbillon. I think the case shape and dial color of the original is fantastic. But I prefer it on the strap.
Can somebody please forward this to ALS?
By: mrds : April 24th, 2020-10:00
I KNEW it wasn‘t impossible to integrate a watch with a bracelet 😄 I still prefer the look on a strap, this one comes too close to a Nautilus imho. Cheers, Daniel
I kinda expected this to come
By: Mr.Gatsby : April 24th, 2020-10:06
LF’s answer to the Nautilus shortage issue. Mixed feelings, mixed feelings. But I must say I have a soft spot for LF
Amazing looking watch
By: dte2 : April 24th, 2020-10:35
Wish it had a date function though (please don't shoot) Also no tourbillon....
I was already a Nautilus fan,
By: tahoeblue : April 25th, 2020-22:35
so looks pretty good to me. But no interest in a tourbillon in my sport watch. Could have been an exciting introduction.
Wonderful piece!
By: MTR : April 26th, 2020-06:40
I hope they will make a variant without Tourbillon one day. This complication is most of the time “senseless” = without added value (unless you wear a pocket watch). And IMO in a sports watch it is just misplaced. And makes this beautiful watch less reach...